DAP Youth Section Back to Professional Site
Home Drugs Information Advice School Projects who_we_are.htm Games
Problem Page Search Site Links Poll Competition Contact Us
 
 
Find Local Help - Click here

Drugs Information: Frequently Asked Questions...

Are all drugs addictive?
It depends on what we mean by addiction. People can become psychologically dependent on any drug – or anything else for that matter. This means that the person using drugs feels they cannot cope or face the world unless they are under the influence of drugs. This form of dependency has more to do with the people using the drug rather than about the particular drug they are taking.

In contrast people can only become physically dependent on certain drugs. Physical dependency results from the repeated, heavy use of drugs like heroin, tranquillisers and alcohol. Heavy and continual use of these drugs can change the body chemistry so that if someone does not get a repeat dose they suffer physical withdrawal symptoms - the shakes, flu like effects. They have to keep taking the drug just to stop themselves from feeling ill.

Continual use of drugs like cannabis, ecstasy and LSD does not result in physical dependency, even though people may become psychologically dependent. With other drugs – and particularly stimulant drugs such as cocaine, crack, amphetamine and the nicotine in cigarettes – there is debate over the extent that physical dependence can occur.

What are the most commonly used drugs?
The most commonly used mood-altering drug used in the Ireland is caffeine – contained in tea, coffee, many soft drinks and colas, some confectionery, included in many medicines and available in over-the-counter stimulant preparations.

Apart from medicines in general the next most commonly used drug is alcohol, followed by the nicotine in cigarettes and other tobacco based products.

When it comes to illegal and other socially unacceptable drugs the list goes from the one most people have tried down to the one least tried:

  • Cannabis

  • Amphetamine

  • Nitrites/ poppers

  • LSD

  • Magic mushrooms

  • Ecstasy

  • Solvents (aerosols, gases and glues)

  • Cocaine

  • Minor tranquillisers (not prescribed)

  • Heroin and crack cocaine

Why do young people take drugs?

Enjoyment
Despite all the concerns about illicit drug use and the attendant lifestyle by young people, it is probably still the case that the lives of most young people are centred on school, home and employment and that most drug use is restricted to the use of tobacco and alcohol.

Even so, the evidence of drug use within youth suggests that the experience of substances is often pleasurable rather than negative and damaging. So probably the main reason why young people take drugs is that they enjoy them.

Environment
Many young people live in communities which suffer from multiple deprivation, with high unemployment, low quality housing and where the surrounding infra-structure of local services is fractured and poorly resourced. In such communities drug supply and use often thrive as an alternative economy often controlled by powerful criminal groups. As well as any use that might be associated with the stress and boredom of living in such communities, young people with poor job prospects recognise the financial advantages and the status achievable through the business of small scale supply of drugs.

However, drug use is certainly not restricted to areas of urban deprivation. As the press stories of expulsions from private schools and drug use in rural areas show, illicit drug use is an aspect of our society from top to bottom and in all regions.

Curiosity
Most young people are naturally curious and want to experiment with different experiences. For some, drugs are a good conversation point, they are interesting to talk about and fascinate everyone.

The defence mechanism
Some young people will use drugs specifically to ease the trauma and pain of unsatisfactory relationships and the physical and emotional abuse arising from unhappy home lives. Such young people will often come to the attention of the school. If these problems can be addressed, then if drugs are involved they can become less of a problem.

Natural rebellion
Whether or not part of any particular subset of youth culture, young people like to be exclusive, own something that is personal to themselves and consciously or unconsciously drug use may act as a means of defiance to provoke adults into a reaction.

Promotion and availability
There is considerable pressure to use legal substances. Alcohol and pain-relieving drugs are regularly advertised on television. The advertising of tobacco products is now banned on television, but recent research from Strathclyde University published by the Cancer Research Campaign concluded that cigarette advertising does encourage young people to start smoking and reinforces the habit among existing smokers.

Despite legislation, children and teenagers have no problems obtaining alcohol and tobacco from any number of retail outlets. Breweries refurbish pubs with young people in mind, bringing in music, games, more sophisticated decor and so on while the general acceptance of these drugs is maintained through sports sponsorship, promotions and other marketing strategies. Obviously, the illicit market is more discreet, but those determined to experiment appear to have little trouble obtaining drugs.

Cost
Value for money is often a factor as to which drug to use. Cannabis sufficient for a few joints would cost about 5 EURO, while an LSD trip would also cost around 5 EURO. In terms of how long the effects last, this compares very favourably with an average price for a pint of lager of around 5 EURO. By the same token, ecstasy of highly variable quality is still selling for up to 15 EURO a tablet and many drug users have been voting with their wallet and turning to cheaper drugs such as LSD and amphetamine.


Should drugs be legalised?
The call for the present drug laws to be changed has come from many quarters. The reasons for wanting change and for maintaining them are given here. The debate itself can be broken down into three key elements:

  • Civil liberties versus the duty of the state;

  • The harm caused by drugs and enforcing prohibition;

  • How would a legalised regime be managed?

Civil liberties

Freedom to use
The degree to which the state is justified in interfering in the private life of the citizen thereby restricting freedom of choice is hotly debated. The principle of personal choice is applied to a wide range of private activities and why not drug use?

Duty to protect
On the other hand, if by using drugs, an individual is causing significant harm to themselves or others, the state can rightfully seek to counteract that harm. Compulsory wearing of seatbelts is an example. In legislating against drug use, the government is seen to be discouraging a potentially harmful behaviour. Legalising any drug would be sending out the message to society that intoxication is a sanctioned behaviour.

Harm /Health impact
Increasingly health is cited as the main reason for prohibition. The latest international review of cannabis by the World Health Organisation highlights dangers such as lung and throat cancer, and increasing incidence of mental health problems due to prolonged heavy use in a minority of users. Consideration should also be given to whether the harm drugs cause, which may not be great for many users, warrants the government’s intervention.

The harm of current laws
While the drug laws are there to prevent what the government sees as harmful behaviour, some see them as harmful in themselves. They are seen as making users criminals, creating strong and lucrative black markets and stigmatising those who need help the most - the addict.

How would legalisation be managed?
Crucial to the debate on legalisation are the issues around the practicalities of one situation over another. On the one hand making drugs legal and more available will result in more use and so increasing the incidence of harmful side effects - at great cost to society. On the other hand, removing a black market and could raise drug related revenues to the government, save on police costs and help regulate the sale and consumption of drugs through regulated sales (as is done with alcohol).

Other related issues

One drug leads to another - escalation theory

Cannabis and other drugs are often regarded as providing a 'gateway' to more or problematic drug use. This is known as escalation theory. Does Cannabis lead to taking other drugs?

All that can be said is that most people who use heroin will have previously used cannabis (though only a small proportion of those who try cannabis go on to use heroin). This could be because cannabis actually does (at least for some people) lead to heroin use, but there are alternative explanations. People tend to use cannabis first simply because they come across it first.

Therapeutic use

Another dimension to the reform debate has been the use of cannabis for therapeutic purposes. The British Medical Association has leant its support to calls for further research and an examination of the law permitting its medical use.

Can Cannabis slow people down?

Cannabis slows down the messages passing through the brain. It also triggers the reward centres in the brain, making the user want to try it again.

The half-life of cannabis in a human body is four days.

This means that half of the active ingredient (THC) or its derivatives will still be present 4 days after it was smoked. A quarter will be present after 8 days, and so on, until the remaining traces are so slight as to be negligible. Cannabis can be detected 21 days or more after it was smoked (depending on how much was taken).

If a tap pours water into a wash-basin quicker than the drain lets it out, the basin will fill up and overflow. If cannabis is put in to a body quicker than it is got rid of, the active ingredient will accumulate, especially in fatty tissue like the brain.

If a person smokes cannabis weekly, or daily, he/she will not be free of the active ingredient at any time in the week. A common effect is that after some time (weeks or months) the person becomes more laid-back, easy-going and "happy going nowhere". They can lose interest in work or study, in sport or in relationships with non-smokers. They can become de-motivated, happy to lie in bed missing work, and they can become angry with anyone who threatens to come between them and their drug.

People who quit using cannabis often comment after two or three weeks that they notice a clarity returning to their
brain. "I can think straight again," said one.

Even if it were not illegal, students would be well advised to avoid cannabis, not only in the few weeks leading up to exams, but throughout the year when they are "inputting" knowledge into their brain. A clouded brain will not retain the information well.

Alcohol can be just as bad for one’s memory, but alcohol is metabolised out of the body more quickly than cannabis, so a moderate drinker (drinking a few units of alcohol at the week-end) will be clear of alcohol for most of the week.

 


Drugs Awareness Programme
Crosscare  The Red House  Clonliffe College  Dublin 3   Republic of Ireland   Tel: + 353 1 836 0911   Fax: + 353 1 836 0745

Website by www.BeeWebbed.com